Quantum Craziness |Science Tech World

Welcome to Science Tech World from the Electric Universe brought to you by The Thunderbolts Projec at Thunderbolts. A new paper published by an MIT physicist claims to theoretically prove that so-called quantum entanglement(or two particles each seemingly occupying multiple states simultaneously)gives rise to a wormhole which allows particles to communicate through a so-called gravitational tunnel. This theory follows from a paper published earlier this year which suggests that when two black holes become entangled, they’re not pulled apart, a wormhole is created which connects the black holes.
The reasoning in these papers follows from a purely mathematical approach to physics and cosmology. In this two-part presentation, physicist Wal Thornhill examines just how reliable this approach is at describing how the universe actually works. A glaring example of the irrational is to be seen in a recent Science Daily report titled, You Can’t Get Entangled Without A Wormhole, which refers to papers by Julian Sonner,a senior postdoc in MITs lab for Nuclear Science and Center for Theoretical Physics, and a related paper by Kristan Jensen of the University of Victoria, and Andreas Karch of the University of Washington.
The article says that, “Essentially, entanglement involves two particles each occupying multiple states at once, a condition referred to as superposition. For example, both particles may simultaneously spin clockwise and counterclockwise, but neither has a definite state until one is measured, causing the other particle to instantly assume a corresponding state. The resulting correlations between the particles are preserved, even if they reside on opposite ends of the universe”. Now, the word entanglement is a euphemism to hide the fact that the physical connection is unknown. So, all that follows isn’t physics, its mystification.
The indeterminacy of states also means were not dealing with physics which relies on being able to determine the state of the system being observed. From a real physicist’s point of view, the most telling experimental fact is that the connection between two entangled particles is instantaneous, even if they reside on opposite ends of the universe .So, the article asked the question, but what enables particles to communicate instantaneously and seemingly faster than the speed of light over such distances?
The simple classical physics answer is that the connection between the two particles is not via a slow transverse electromagnetic wave. Instead, it’s the same kind of connection that we observe between the planets and the Sun: that is, gravity. Newton’s law of gravity does not include time- the force of gravity acts instantaneously. Now, the Electric Universe explains that gravity itself is a form of the electric force that operates upon neutral bodies by distorting the subatomic charged particles within those bodies to form tiny weak electric dipoles.
This simple model explains why gravity is such a weak force (because sub-atomic particles are infinitesimally small) and also why you can’t easily shield from gravity (because all the subatomic particles participate, whether it’s a conductor or non-conductor, whatever its made from).Importantly though, gravity on the cosmic scale allows us to see that the direct electric force between particles operates instantly.
The spookiness and non-locality of quantum phenomena can be understood both physically, and in meaningful language. Entanglement then, is simply an electrical resonance between two subatomic particles each comprised of an identical resonant system of orbiting charged sub-particles. In other words, it’s a repeated pattern – like an atom within an atom.
The instantaneous connection maintains the resonance, or entanglement, between the particles regardless of their relative movement or distance apart. Because the connection is instantaneous there is no Doppler-shift de-tuning or anything like that, the two particles remain in communication. This model that separates the phenomenon of electromagnetic waves in a medium from the direct longitudinal connection between all matters in the universe (that is, the electrical connection), opens up new insights for physicists. For example, physicists attempt to isolate their experiment from outside influences including the observer, but in our Electric Universe there is no isolated system. The observer is a part of the experiment, whether he likes it or not, and as discovered in so-called weird quantum experiments.
Contrast this simple explanation with the meaningless language of the report, and earlier this year, physicists proposed an answer in the form of wormholes, or gravitational tunnels. The group showed that by creating 2 entangled black holes, then pulling them apart, they formed a wormhole – essentially a shortcut through the universe -connecting the distant black holes .Now, black holes are mathematical mistake equivalent to the school mathematics howler dividing by 0 to get infinity. Gravity is weaker than the electric force by a factor of1000 billion times. Now, that’s as close to zero as you can get. So, using gravity to explain the concentrated energy sources observed at the centers of galaxies, and calling them black holes, is bound to give you answers that make no physical sense. The wormholes are a geometric construct in more than 3 dimensions, so they have nothing to do with the real space that physicists, engineers, and you and I have to deal with.
But the article continues. Now an MIT physicist has found that, looked at through the lens of string theory, the creation of two entangled quarks – the building blocks of matter -simultaneously gives rise to a wormhole connecting the pair.
But string theory is, according to Peter Woit – Not Even Wrong. The questions that need to be answered by this piece of whims yare both endless and pointless – pointless because no one knows what a quark is; nor how matter can warp space to form a hole across the universe(or even what that means); nor how that effect can be instantaneous. Space is merely a concept of location in three dimensions. How do you warp a concept? But the article goes on. The theoretical results bolster the relatively new and exciting idea that the laws of gravity holding together the universe may not be fundamental, but arise from something else: quantum entanglement.
That’s hardly a breakthrough when you don’t understand quantum entanglement. You’ll notice that modern physics is in the business of complicating things beyond comprehension, inventing new particles and forces in the hope of a Nobel Prize -it is not the way classical physics was done. Classical physics, until the beginning of the 20th century, was in the business of simplifying particles and forces. There was a strong intuitive feel on the part of leading scientists then, that gravity is simply an electrical force of some description. Like the forces between atoms that form our Earth and everything on it, that’s the conclusion of the Electric Universe based on all the new evidence since then.
The article says, of course, there appears to be a major barrier to reconciling quantum mechanics and general relativity; for years, physicists have tried to come up with a theory of quantum gravity to marry the two fields. You’ll notice that the standard picture of a black hole or a gravitational object in space is represented as a funnel in space-time, usually with an object like, in Earths case, the Moon perched on the edge of the funnel. With the idea being that the Moon, instead of traversing a straight line in space, follows the curve of the funnel. However, the very image itself gives a false picture because we just assume that this gravitational well, or funnel, has gravity pulling from underneath to draw the object down and into the funnel. But, this is using gravity to explain gravity- it’s a circular argument and the image is quite misleading.
An object perched on the surface of this funnel (if gravity were not pulling it down) would remain fixed on that funnel, it would have no force tending to move it downwards, or sideways or upwards, it would remain exactly where it is. But, it’s plain to see that general relativity never explained gravity, it merely described its effect in a geometry that has no reality. And quantum mechanics is a recipe book with no understanding of the ingredients or how they interact. As a result, the rest of the article is appalling nonsense, headlined .Tunneling to the 5th Dimension. It’s only necessary to highlight the meaningless language to show the ideas expressed are imaginary.
For example, two entangled black holes, forgets that the mathematics of black hole theory allows only a single black hole in an empty universe. The Newtonian principle of superposition of gravitating objects doesn’t apply to general relativity. There can never be a second black hole to get entangled. The theorists invoke a wormhole, a tunnel through space-time, produced by pulling two black holes apart. Hyphenating the words space and time to produce a 4th dimension is physically meaningless. Mathematicians use the word dimension to mean a degree of freedom in their equations. There are only three physical dimensions in space, which are measured by length and direction.
Time has no length or direction – you can’t point in the direction of time, time has no arrow, joining space and time has no physical significance. So, you cannot produce physical wormholes in space – it is pure science fiction. One of the authors, Sonner, applied this thinking to quarks (the theoretical subatomic building blocks of matter): To see what emerges from two entangled quarks, he first generated quarks using the Schwinger effect -a concept in quantum theory that enables one to create particles out of nothing. Here we see mathematicians resorting to dismissal of a principal of physics that you cannot perform a creation miracle, it’s not scientific.
The author Douglas Adams, in The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, parodied this sleight of hand mercilessly when Zaphod Beeblebrox used an infinite improbability drive to rescue Ford Prefect and Arthur Dent in deep space. Particle physicists have been using the infinite improbability principle since the inception of quantum theory. As is well known, Einstein hated the idea. His reported to have said, God doesn’t play dice. He was right. As soon as you disconnect cause from effect, you are not doing science. Another quote from the article, Sonner mapped the entangled quarks onto a four-dimensional space, considered a representation of space-time. In contrast, gravity is thought to exist in the next dimension as, according to Einstein’s laws, it acts to bend and shape space-time, thereby existing in the fifth dimension. There is no four-dimensional space, there is no physical 5th dimension, gravity is not explained by general relativity, it is merely described in a limited an unreal geometric way. It is not shown how imaginary four-dimensional space can be warped. Cause and effect are disconnected – it just not science, it’s merely mathematics.
The article finally leaves all common sense and logic far behind. To see what geometry may emerge in the fifth dimension from entangled quarks in the fourth, Sonner employed holographic duality, a concept in string theory. While a hologram is a two-dimensional object it contains all the information necessary to represent a three-dimensional view. Essentially, holographic duality is a way to derive a more complex dimension from the next lowest dimension.
This is total rubbish! There is no two-dimensional object – all objects are three dimensional so, there can be no information held in two dimensions. Real objects and information can only occupy three dimensions. Coming back to the Space News report, the black hole is an alleged product of Einstein’s theory of gravitation, but so is the wormhole between the two supposed black holes (its known as an Einstein-Rosen bridge).But, then the wormhole is used and related to the two black holes to define gravitation. Gravity emerges from the more fundamental phenomenon of entangled black holes, the article says. But this argument is simply a circular argument and so, it is nonsense.

2 thoughts on “Quantum Craziness |Science Tech World

  1. Great weblog here! Additionally your site a lot up very fast! What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link on your host? I wish my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *